MOND
I had to give a talk today on modified newtonian dynamics (mond). It was interesting if only to make me realize how there's lots of holes in every theory and how every scientist likes to argue. The basic idea of mond is that people who don't like the idea of a universe filled cold dark matter are trying to come up with ways to explain lots of things by changing how gravity works. "Dark matter" was first proposed was a result of measuring orbits on the outskirts of a galaxy. Things were going a lot faster than they should have been. People suggested that this extra force was coming from unseen (dark) matter. This stuff still hasn't been "observed" in any direct way. In the eighties, perhaps because of all the coke, def-leopard, and big hair, people started hacking with normal, boring, newtonian gravity. They were adding all sorts of modifications to see if they could reproduce something that fit the "extra gravity". The paper i had to review in my talk was one that tweaked the derivation of "GR" and the "einstein equation" to add an extra term. It was pretty neat since it is testable - it makes concrete predictions that are falsifiable. Dark matter doesn't predict curves, it is fit to them. Both seem pretty ad-hoc. There's some cool simulations at the McKenzie, Virgo, or UKAFF supercomputers. This is a plot of a "galactic rotation curve". The x axis is distance from the center (kiloparsec = 3000 Light Years). The y axis is the orbital velocity (km/sec ~ 3Light Years per million years). The normal newtonian dynamics predicts much lower velocities at large distances but by tweaking gravity, you can fit the curve.
3 Comments:
you left out the critical fact that dark matter is required cosmologically...without more mass, the dynamics of the universe cannot be explained. MOND doesn't quite work in terms of physics in general, mostly because it violates gauge symmetries in extreme situations (of course, someone could possibly modify MOND...MMMMOND!) sigh...i hate cosmology.
actually, the paper i just reviewed went back and modified the action to make the theory fully covariant. traditional mond as just a newtonian hack doesn't respect invariance and is totally ad-hoc, but this new one does respect the symmetries and invariance. and some did argue that it can explain large scale structure and the wmap power-spectrum. it is an extra attractive force, just like extra mass would be. there are some testable predictions about the power-spectrum that matched mond - supressed adiabatic fluctuations etc. it's not perfect, but at least it is a testable thing, not just a "fit". there's a 2002 review paper that goes into it, but i didn't want to here for fear of the "JARGON" factor. i hate cosmology too. especially those that can't speak english.
I think it's all because of the coke and def leppard
Post a Comment
<< Home